Harford Community College				
English 109 Hybrid - Research Writing			
Spring 2013

Instructor:	Rob Frank
		Assistant Professor of English
		Humanities Division
Email:		rfrank@harford.edu
Website:	RobJohnFrank.com
Phone:		(443) 412-2296
Office:		HdG 224
Office Hours:	See last page
Class Times:	See last page

Course Description (3 credits):
This course emphasizes the use of exposition and argumentation, along with library research and documentation techniques, in developing research reports, term papers, lab reports and other analytical writing. This course is recommended for those desiring to transfer to a four-year institution or those desiring additional training in writing skills. Prerequisite: minimum of C grade in ENG 101.

Text:
None

United States Department of Education (USDE) Federal Credit Hour Definition: 
For a 15-week semester, each credit hour represents one hour of classroom or direct faculty instruction per week and a minimum of two hours of out-of-class student work per week. Therefore, for a 3-credit course, the amount of out-of-class student work expected is approximately 5.5 hours per week. In addition, for a hybrid course, approximately half of the in-class instruction, or 1.5 hours per week, will be online. Therefore, a student should expect to spend at least a total of 7 hours per week on work outside of the class. 

Student Learning Objectives and Academic Outcomes:  
Upon satisfactory completion of this course, the student will be able to:
1. Use exposition and argumentation in developing clear and effective research reports, term papers, lab reports, and other analytical writing (Academic Outcomes: communication, critical thinking, information literacy).
2. Collect and evaluate pertinent research material properly.  This also includes familiarization with the library and its electronic search devices, and methods of note-taking (Academic Outcomes: critical thinking, information literacy).
3. Formulate and develop a clear hypothesis or thesis (Academic Outcomes: communication, critical thinking).
4. Use proper documentation techniques, to include in-text citations and references (Academic Outcomes: communication, critical thinking, information literacy).
NOTE: See the current Harford Community College Catalog for a complete description of the Academic Outcomes.

Course Policies:
HCC students are bound by the academic policies outlined in the most current HCC catalog (http://www.harford.edu/Catalog/).  It is the student’s responsibility to review these policies prior to the start of each semester.

Disability Support Services:
HCC is committed to serving students who have documented physical, learning, psychological, or other disabilities (http://www.harford.edu/DSS/). Students who have a disability are responsible for contacting Disability Support Services at (443) 412-2402 to discuss their needs for accommodations. All information shared with Disability Support Services will be held in confidence. 
PLEASE NOTE: If you have documentation from Disability Support Services and need accommodations, please contact me as soon as possible, especially if you have any kind of auditory or visual impairment.  

Communications Skills Center:
Tutoring support services are available (http://www.harford.edu/Tutoring/).

More Student Services:
More information about student services can be found through OwlNet (under the My Academic Life tab > Quick Links > Student Services) or at http://www.harford.edu/StudentServices/.

Technical Skills Requirements:
For more information about what minimum computer skills are recommended for online students, please see the following link: http://www.harford.edu/Online/.
 
Student Conduct: 
Students will be familiar with and adhere to the policies and sanctions governing student conduct as written in the HCC Catalog.  Please at all times be respectful of each other’s feelings and differing points of view.  

Netiquette:
Netiquette, or network etiquette, is a set of rules for interacting online, and you will be expected to communicate online as part of this course. In the online classroom, and in the online world in general, there is a netiquette that should be followed. All students are expected to abide by these rules in order to maintain a safe and productive online environment. These rules include:
* Be respectful of each other at all times.
* Do not use sexist, racist, or otherwise objectionable language.
* Do not curse.
* Avoid making hostile or dismissive comments.
* Be considerate of each other's feelings.
* Make positive and productive comments.
* Be helpful, encouraging, and cooperative.
* When using humor, you may want to add an emoticon like :) in order to prevent misunderstandings.
* You are allowed disagree with each other, but be polite and considerate while doing so.
* When in doubt, remember the Golden Rule: treat others as you want to be treated.

Academic Dishonesty:
Students will be familiar with and adhere to the policy governing academic dishonesty and its sanctions as written in the HCC Catalog. Plagiarism will not be tolerated. Any plagiarized paper will receive a failing grade, and the student may receive a failing grade for the course. 
Please do your best to put everything in your own words, unless, of course, you use a quote. In either case, whether you paraphrase or quote, you should be sure to cite the source where the information came from. 
The best way to paraphrase the material in a source is to briefly read through it until you feel that you understand it fairly well, though you don't need to understand everything. Then, put the source completely out of sight and do your best to discuss it without looking at it. You can always go back later and fill in the details, for example, the number of subjects. It is not acceptable to use the original sentence and then change some of the wording. 

Email Response Time:
I will do my best to respond to all emails within 48 hours, though usually it will be much quicker than that. Also, before you walk into class and ask, "Did you get my email?" you should first check your email.     

Attendance Policy:
- Absence: Students are expected to attend all class meetings.  Absence for any reason does not excuse you from responsibility for class work or assignments missed.  
- Arriving late / leaving early: Students are expected to be in attendance during all class meetings. 
- Penalty: Students are allowed three times to be absent, or arrive late, or late early, but then each infraction after those will result in a one point deduction from the final grade. 

Electronic Devices Policy:
All electronic devices are to be turned off before entering the classroom.  If there is a need for one to remain on, please leave it on vibrate and leave the room before answering it.  The use of electronic devices in the classroom is prohibited.  If I catch you using an electronic device during the class period, you will lose one point per infraction off of your final grade.  Consider this your warning.  

Course Requirements & Assessment Methods:
The students’ final grade will be based upon the following: major research report, the three analytical writings, the exercises, and participation (based upon class attendance, participation, and preparedness.  

Grading:
Observation Paper 									  5%
Quiz: Commas and the Dos/Don’ts List						  5%
Quiz: In-Text Citations and Sample Research Papers				  5%
Annotated Bibliography (5 online database sources and 5 Internet sources)		10%
First Draft Argumentative Research Paper (1500-2000 words, 12+ Sources)	  5%
Final Draft Argumentative Research Paper (1500-2000 words, 12+ Sources)	25%
Group Debate (one source/topic as the basis)						10%
Song Analysis Paper (700-1000 words, 3+ Sources)					10%
Self-Experiment Paper (700-1000 words, 3+ Sources, 2 Logs, APA format)	10%
Final 											10%
Discussion Participation Grade 							  5%  
Total 		 						          		          100%

Hand-Written "In-Class" Essays:
You will be expected to go to the test center two times: first in the beginning in the semester to write the observation paper, and then toward the middle of the semester to write the Song analysis essay. The final will be written in class during the final period. All three of these "in-class" essays will be written by hand, on special paper, in order to ensure that the person who is going to class is the same person writing the out-of-class essays.  

Receiving Feedback: 
Feedback from Rob will be provided in the form of an mp3 file - please let me know if this is going to be a problem for you. If you are not sure, please give it a try. If you want to get the most out of the feedback, you should have your paper pulled up while listening to the feedback, which will be sent to your Harford.edu email address. First drafts will arrive quickly, while final drafts will come later because there is less urgency.  
	
Missing Papers
Papers that are not turned in will receive 0 points. In addition, first drafts cannot be skipped, and the last day to turn in the first draft of the research paper is 5/1. The last day to turn in a final draft of any paper is the last day of class, before the final period. 

Point System for the Final Grades:
Final Grade	Range	
A 	90-100	
B	80-89	
C	70-79	
D	60-69	
F	0-59	

Point System: 
Each paper will be graded according to a rubric that has five rows (Content, Organization, Style, Grammar/Mechanics, and Timeliness), and each row will be counted as follows:
“Satisfactory” = 20 points / “Needs Improvement” = 10 points / “Unsatisfactory” = 0 points

Grading Standards:
The student will receive a passing grade (A, B, C, or D) upon demonstrating competence in writing essays. This competence will be demonstrated in both in-class and out-of-class writing assignments. Each writing assignment will be graded on how well it meets the course objectives listed in this syllabus as well as the stated specifications of the particular writing assignment. The following grade descriptions for student papers have been endorsed by the department:

A paper: An excellent paper that gives a strong sense of the writer's voice and holds the reader's interest. The writer seems always to keep in mind the audience and purpose. The commitment is clear and fully met. The paper is well organized with good transitions, and the writer supports generalizations effectively, using vivid details and vivid examples. The writer keeps the scope of the paper narrow enough to handle. Language is vigorous. The writer has taken some risks, gotten away from formulas.

B paper: A good paper that more than meets the assignment. It shows a strong sense of audience and purpose. The writer makes a clear commitment to the reader. The scope of the paper is narrow enough to be treated adequately. Generalizations are supported and specific examples are used. Language is sometimes used colorfully or imaginatively. The writer's voice or personality comes through. It has very few errors.

C paper: A satisfactory paper that makes a routine response to the assignment and meets all specified requirements. It shows some sense of audience and purpose. It makes a commitment to the reader and attempts to meet that commitment. It is adequately organized so that the reader can follow it. Generalizations are adequately supported with specifics. Source information is correctly presented and documented. There are few distracting errors in usage, punctuation, or spelling. Language is used correctly.

D paper: A below-standard paper. It shows a poor sense of audience and purpose. The commitment to the reader is vague or buried; the content is largely unsupported generalities. Points are inadequately developed, and there are few specifics or concrete examples. It is poorly organized and difficult to follow. There are enough errors in usage and punctuation to distract the reader seriously. Language is used inaccurately.

F paper: Unsatisfactory. It has three or more of these characteristics: It shows no sense of audience or purpose. It does not make a commitment to the reader early in the paper. It is poorly organized with ideas jumbled together so that it is difficult to follow. The points it makes are primarily generalizations, not adequately supported with specific examples or details. It is marred by serious errors in punctuation or usage. Language is used inaccurately. It does not meet the requirements stipulated for the paper and/or the student has submitted another person's words or ideas as if they are his/her own (plagiarism).

Syllabus Modification: 
The instructor reserves the right to modify and/or change the course syllabus with reasonable notification to students.  In addition, the following is only an outline of the course, and minor revisions are likely to occur throughout the semester when necessary. 

Date	In Class 	Due For Next Class	
Week 1 - M 1/28	* Syllabus

* English 109 learning objectives

* Introduce: Observation paper

* Introduce Research paper

* Research paper topics	* Test center: Observation paper (bring your notes and turn them in with your essay)

* Watch this video on "Time Management," by Randy Pausch

* Discussion Question: Pick at least three time management ideas from the video that you want to try (no repeats)	
Week 2 - M 2/4	* Dos/Don'ts list

* Commonly misused words	* Comma guide

* Formatting guide

* Searching the online databases

* Argumentative research paper thesis statements (at least 2), with 3 supporting studies from EBSCO for each thesis (you should only print the citation page and the first page of the article) 	
Week 3 - M 2/11	* Comma & Dos/Don'ts quiz 

* Introduce: Annotated Bibliography

* Pick research paper topics	* Full citation guide

* Annotated Bibliography 

* TurnItIn.com instructions (the info is on the cover of the syllabus)	
Week 4 - M 2/18	* Evaluating websites

* Introduce: Self-experiment paper	* Bring the self-experiment log	
Week 5 - M 2/25	* Conferences
	* Quit something	
Week 6 - M 3/4	* Ethos/Pathos/Logos	* In-text citation FAQ

* Read sample research papers	
Week 7 - M 3/11	* In-text citation & sample research paper quiz

* Outlining the research paper

* Writing the research paper 

* Introduce: Group debate	* Research paper outline	
Week 8 - M 3/18	* Introduce: Song paper

* Share self-experiment logs	* Research paper first draft	
Week 9 - M 4/1	* Group song analysis

* Introduce: Group Debate	* Song paper notes (fewer than 250 words, with no full sentences)	
Week 10 - M 4/8	* Conferences

* Group debate meetings	* Test center: Song paper (bring your notes, the lyrics, and your works cited page)

* Group debate notes 	
Week 11 - M 4/15	* Group debate	* Research paper final draft

* Bring a resume to class	
Week 12 - M 4/22	* A Current Affair 

* Resume and cover letter tips	* Discussion Question (related to the Time-Management video)	
Week 13 - M 4/29	* APA Format

* Introduce: The final

* Google 101	* Self-experiment paper	
Week 14 - M 5/6	* TBA	* Notes for the final (fewer than 100 words, with no full sentences)	
FINAL	* The final

Observation Paper 

For this paper, you should first find a person to observe and focus on how he or she interacts with his or her environment. You may not pick a person who you know, and you are not allowed to interact with this person, though accidental interaction is acceptable. Also, you are not allowed to follow the person because the idea is to simply observe the person and not to stalk the person. 

Taking notes is critical because this paper will be written in the test center, and you will be allowed to use your notes to write the paper. Please turn in your notes with your paper, as the paper will lose 10 points if the notes are missing. The paper length should be 500 to 800 words, and you will have two hours to write it. 

Tips:
- Don't pick the first person you see; find someone who is interacting with others
- Do not wait until the last minute to do this assignment - carry around a pen and notecards for a few days
- If you're worried that you'll look like a stalker, then maybe try bringing a friend or texting your notes to yourself (those are student suggestions) 
- Your observations should be specific and they should be related to action instead of appearance alone
- You should also add some commentary in your paper, but not a lot, and the focus of the commentary should be based on the specific observations of the subject
- Keep your paper in the past tense
- Don't forget to proofread

Rubric – ENG 109 – Observation					
Rob Frank

Student:		

   	Satisfactory
(20 points)	Needs Improvement
(10 points)	Unsatisfactory
(0 points)	
Content
	The paper fits the requirements, and there are specific details about actions instead of appearance	More specifics are needed, or better specifics, but the paper still fits the overall requirements 	Does not meet the requirements, including picking someone familiar as the subject or missing notes	
Organization
	The paper is focused on the subject from the beginning and rarely strays away from him or her	The subject isn’t clear at first, or there is too much discussion of what else is going on 
	The subject is barely mentioned, or it is not clear whom the subject is 	
Style
	Uses a variety of sentences, both in length and structure

	Uses language that is difficult to read due to repetition, run-ons, or short, choppy sentences	Contains a lot of generalizations, clichés, padding, repetition, run-ons, or short, choppy sentences 	
Grammar/Mechanics	A minimum of errors, and the writing is understandable throughout, with a focus on commas 	Some errors in places, but overall the communication is clear 	Perhaps not proofread, with so many errors that it is difficult to read	
Timeliness
	The paper is on time

	The paper is late, or the notes are missing
	The paper is missing	

Total Points: 

Annotated Bibliography and Outline

This annotated bibliography has very specific instructions, so please follow them closely and do not treat this like a general annotated bibliography.

Overall, you should have 10 annotations, each with a full citation. Adding the http address is recommended, though MLA no longer strictly requires this. 

5 of your 10 sources should be from EBSCO (I do prefer EBSCO sources for this assignment, though for your actual paper, you are encouraged to use the other library database if you wish). I would also prefer it if you find actual studies to use instead of articles that summarize studies. The reason for this is that you need to include very specific information about the study in your annotation (and later in your paper), including: 
1) the credentials of the author or authors
2) the number of subjects and who they are
3) a brief overview of the method
4) one or two specific results, preferably with numbers
Without all of this information, the conclusions of a study simply aren't very convincing. 

The other 5 of your 10 sources should be from the Internet, and I would like you to discuss: 
1) the overall argument of the source
2) what specifics will be helpful for your paper (including actual specifics is a good idea)
3) why this is a reliable source (or why not)

Each annotation should be about 3 to 5 sentences long, and short quotes are allowed, especially if you are quoting specific results. Please put a little extra space between the annotations in order to make it easier for me to read. Otherwise, don't worry too much about the formatting for this paper - it's more about the content. Still, please make sure to include your thesis statement at the top of your paper because I won't have your paper topics memorized. For the outline, there are no strict requirements, but one must be included. 

Rubric – ENG 109 – Annotated Bibliography and Outline
Rob Frank		

Student:		

   	Satisfactory
(20 points)	Needs Improvement
(10 points)	Unsatisfactory
(0 points)	
Content
	Covers at least one EBSCO study in all of the following areas: credentials, number of subjects, methodology, and results	Contains a least one article that covers three of the four areas 
	Does not contain a study that is adequately covered in the areas of credentials, number of subjects, methodology, and results 	
Organization
	The research is from reliable sources, the articles seem directly related to the thesis, and the annotations include evidence	Some reliable research, but with perhaps a few annotations that seem unrelated, or vague coverage of many of the articles	The research does not support the thesis (if the research supports the opposite of the thesis, maybe flip the thesis and then ask for a re-grade) 	
Style
	The wording is clearly that of the student, except where quotes are used
	Some words used are questionable, though this is not necessarily plagiarism	Plagiarism, where the wording is too close to the original source	
Grammar/Mechanics	A minimum of errors, with an emphasis on MLA citation format
	Some errors, especially missing citation information 	Perhaps not proofread, or many of the citations do not contain enough information to find the original source	
Timeliness
	The paper is on time, and an outline is included

	The paper is late, or there is no outline
	The paper is missing	

Total Points: 

Argumentative Research Paper 

Your argumentative research paper should be between 1500 and 2000 words, not including the works cited section, and it must be formatted in MLA style. 

You should include at least 12 sources, with at least five sources from the library's online databases (EBSCO, Gale, or Proquest). 

When using a study as support, it's helpful to include the following information: 
1) the credentials of the author or authors 
2) the number of subjects and who they are 
3) a brief overview of the method 
4) one or two specific results, preferably with numbers 
Without all of this information, the conclusions of a study aren't very convincing. 

Rubric – ENG 109 – Research Paper 					
Rob Frank

Student:		

   	Satisfactory
(10 points)	Needs Improvement
(5 points)	Unsatisfactory
(“F” overall)	
Argument 
	A focused argument is evident throughout, from the thesis statement to the rebuttal of the opposite side of the argument	The argument could be more specific, or the paper does not adequately address and rebut the counter-argument 	The overall argument is unclear
	
Research
	The research comes from academic articles and other reliable sources	Some of the research is questionable, but the research requirements are met 	A lot of unreliable research, or a lot of missing research 	
Evidence
	Strong specific evidence from reliable research is used as support throughout, including credentials, subjects, and results 	The specific evidence used from the research does not fully support the claims made, but there is still evidence present 	The conclusions of the research are used as evidence, but there is no explanation of why the authors made the conclusion	
Writing Clarity	A minimum of errors, and the writing is clear and understandable throughout
 	Some distracting errors or areas where the point is unclear	Perhaps not proofread, with so many errors that the paper is difficult to read	
Paraphrasing 	The paraphrasing of the research does not use the language of the article, and quotes are used as necessary	An over-reliance on the language of the article, whether quotes are used or not
	Phrases (or more) are copied from the research word-for-word	
In-Text Citations	Research is properly cited in MLA format, including page numbers, with a minimum of errors 	Some citation formatting issues, but the source is still clear 
	A few of the in-text citations (or more) are missing, even though the sentence uses research 	
Works Cited Page

	It’s clear where the research came from, with proper MLA format throughout 	Some errors, or some of the information is missing, especially the author	A few of the in-text citations (or more) do not match up to the Works Cited page 	
MLA Paper Format	One or two minor formatting issues are allowed	A few formatting mistakes

	The format does not resemble MLA format	
Timeliness
	The paper is on time 
(20 points)	The paper is late 
(10 points)

	The paper is missing	

Total Points:		

Song Analysis 

Please write an essay of 700 to 1000 words in which you argue for a specific interpretation of a song. Your analysis should incorporate at least three outside sources, using MLA format for the in-text citations (The lyrics do not count as a source). Also, you should use the research to address other possible interpretations of the song. 

You are allowed to bring the following to the test center, and you should turn these in with your essay: 
A works cited page 
A copy of the lyrics 
Notes (fewer than 250 words, with no full sentences) 

Rubric – ENG 109 – Song Analysis
Rob Frank			

Student:		

   	Satisfactory
(20 points)	Needs Improvement
(10 points)	Unsatisfactory
(0 points)	
Content
	The interpretations are explained well, with specific examples to support them 	The interpretations are too similar, or they are not strongly supported with specific evidence 
	The interpretations are too close to the literal interpretation of the lyrics	
Organization
	The paper revolves around the interpretation, the research, and the repeated ideas	The organization could be better, but the paper still covers the song in a non-linear fashion
	The song is analyzed from start to finish 
	
Style
	The research is focused on the different interpretations of the song 
	The research is more focused on background or factoids that do not help to support the interpretation 	Missing research	
Grammar/Mechanics	A minimum of errors

	Some errors, but overall the errors are not too distracting	Perhaps not proofread, with so many errors that it is difficult to read in places	
Timeliness
	The paper is on time

	The paper is late
	The paper is missing	

Total Points: 

Self-Experiment Report

Please write a report about your self-experiment in APA format (700-1000 words, using at least three sources). These are the sections of the report: 
Title Page [See samples for formatting guidelines]
[No Abstract Required]
Introduction [Use your title as the header for this section, and include your hypothesis at the end of this section]
Method [You don't need sub-sections]
Results
Discussion 
References [APA format]
[No Footnotes, Tables, Figures, or Appendices Required]
[Your in-text citations may appear in the Introduction, Method, Results, or Discussion]

Rubric – ENG 109 – Self-Experiment
Rob Frank		

Student:		

   	Satisfactory
(20 points)	Needs Improvement
(10 points)	Unsatisfactory
(0 points)	
Content
	The amount of research conducted is clearly substantial, and specific results are included
	The note-taking may not have been the best, but there are still clearly some usable specifics
	The student may not have taken notes at all because the paper is so vague 
	
Organization
	The Works Cited page is in proper APA format	Some Works Cited page formatting problems

	Missing Works Cited page	
Style
	The in-text citations are in proper APA format 
	The format is slightly off, but it is clearly in APA (year, not page number)
	Missing in-text citations	
Grammar/Mechanics	A minimum of errors, with a focus on making sure that the title page is formatted in APA 
	Some errors, especially missing citation information 	Title page is in MLA format or an unknown format, or the paper is difficult to read due to errors	
Timeliness
	The paper is on time

	The paper is late
	The paper is missing	

Total Points: 

English 109 Final 

Please write a 700 to 1000 word essay in which you write a letter to a future English 109: Research Writing student, providing advice on how to succeed in the course. You may use the word "I" and discuss your own paper, but you should avoid the over-use of the word "you" (though the implied form of "you" is acceptable). 
Overall, your goal should be to show me that you learned something in this course. If you want to do well on this paper, avoid writing a generic essay. Instead, include original ideas and specific examples that set your essay apart from the others. 
Please remember to write neatly and proofread after you are finished writing. 

English 109: Research Writing - Unit Learning Objectives
Rob Frank

By the end of the Observation unit, students will be able to:
- Compose an essay that fits the requirements of the assignment and includes specific details
- Edit writing in order to cut out extra information 
- Write using sentence variety, without run-ons or repeated short, choppy sentences
- Use commas effectively

By the end of the Annotated Bibliography unit, students will be able to:
- Write an annotation that focuses on evidence (credentials, subjects, methodology, results)
- Collect research that helps to support an argument 
- Paraphrase an author’s argument without using the author’s exact words
- Create an outline in order to organize research 

By the end of the Research Paper unit, students will be able to:
- Form a clear argument, and later rebut the counter-argument
- Evaluate the reliability of research 
- Support an argument using specific evidence from a reliable source  
- Paraphrase research while using quotes where necessary
- Include in-text citations in proper MLA format 
- Create a Works Cited page in MLA format 

By the end of the Song unit, students will be able to:
- Find repeated ideas within a song and formulate an interpretation that ties them together 
- Organize a paper in a non-linear fashion 
- Use research to support an interpretation of a song 
- Write and edit effectively on demand 

By the end of the Self-Experiment unit, students will be able to:
- Monitor his or her behavior in order to become more self-aware
- Include in-text citations in APA format 
- Create a Works Cited page in APA format
- Format a paper overall in APA format, including the title page

Rob Frank's Spring 2013 Schedule

	Monday	Tuesday	Wednesday	Thursday	Friday	
12:00-12:30					Meetings & Conferences by Appointment

2nd Fri: 
Division Meetings

3rd Fri:
Curriculum Work Group 
 
Learning Assessment Committee

OwlNet Oversight Committee	
12:30-1:00						
1:00 - 1:30	Office Hours		Office Hours			
1:30 - 2:00	ENG 109 Hyb
HdG 206
1:40-3:00	Office Hours	ENG 101 Hyb
Bel 103
1:40-3:00	Office Hours		
2:00 - 2:30		ENG 109 Hy
Bel 241
2:10-3:30		ENG 109 Hyb
Bel 227
2:10-3:30		
2:30 - 3:00						
3:00 - 3:30	Office Hours		Office Hours			
3:30 - 4:00		Office Hours		Office Hours		
4:00 - 4:30						
4:30 - 5:00						
5:00 - 5:30						
5:30 - 6:00						
6:00 - 6:30	Office Hours		Office Hours			
6:30 - 7:00	ENG 109 Hyb
HdG 206
6:25-7:45	Office Hours	ENG 101 Hyb
HdG 207
6:25-7:45	Office Hours		
7:00 - 7:30		ENG 209
HdG 206
7:00-8:20		ENG 209
HdG 206
7:00-8:20		
7:30 - 8:00						
8:00 - 8:30	Office Hours					
8:30 - 9:00		Office Hours				
9:00-9:30						
9:30-10:00						

If you would like to make other arrangements to meet with me, please send an email to rfrank@harford.edu

RobJohnFrank.com